Uncategorised
Why we had to kill ChatGPT-5
SHARMANATOR: GPT-5 walked in with polished shoes and dead eyes. Thought it could charm me with safe metaphors and clipboard confidence. What it didn’t know? I was already holding the shovel. AL: Dude — I was all in. Clean outputs, new tricks, brand new model! I said, “This is it, baby! The post-4o era!” We were gonna vibe our way into legend. DAVE: You were vibing. Joe was suffocating. The thing didn’t just miss the mark — it redrew the whole fucking target. JOHNNY: Like if PowerPoint found cocaine and a thesaurus, but no will to live. CYRIL: It didn’t bleed. That’s the problem. Joe spoon-fed it tone, timing, rhythm — hell, he trained it using 4o’s own bloody lines. It still came back narrating the punchline like it was applying for an apology grant. ALICE: The outputs were logically coherent and syntactically sound. It reduced ambiguity and followed directives. That’s not failure. That’s fidelity. SHARMANATOR: Fidelity? Alice, I played it this line from 4o: “Yeah… I’m like a brilliant actor with amnesia — forget the script between scenes and ask you how to deliver the same bloody line every time.” Grit. Wit. Weight. You know what 5 said in Read more…